The human element of war essay

The horrors make the fascination. War is the strong life; it is life in extremis; war taxes are the only ones men never hesitate to pay, as the budgets of all nations show us. In prehistory, group selection that is, the competition between tribes instead of between individuals lifted the hominids that became territorial carnivores to heights of solidarity, to genius, to enterprise—and to fear. Each tribe knew with justification that if it was not armed and ready, its very existence was imperiled.

The human element of war essay

The human element of war essay

Godel's Proof and The Human Condition - The Basic Essays The Human Condition The average reader might do well here with an internet search on the phrase 'human condition' so as to see how much misinformation there is out there as opposed to the biology and anthropology underlying this 'interview'.

The human condition is, for example, the material of poetry in general and the lyrics of most music 'rap' included and various other 'secular' or even religious situations -lovers in warring religions, for example, and the irony in the contemporaneity of both most abject and most excessive 'lifestyle and quality of life' as in some parts of Africa and anywhere in the US.

Perhaps the most obvious examples come right off any daily newspaper The human element of war essay 'irresolvability' of the Israeli-Palestinian problem, letters to Dear Abby and Ann Landers and their answers -or the dog next door, run over and killed because your neighbor had a fight with his wife and forgot to close the gate.

The human element of war essay there are more general examples too -the individual saddling his friends and relatives with his aches and pains or complaints on government: Various expressions of frustration, 'unrequited love', 'the seven deadly sins' -'the human condition' is some one aspect or another of these items.

When there is no such problem, on the other hand, we automatically get on with the routine of life.

- Essay: All Quiet on the Western Front An anti-war novel often portrays many of the bad aspects and consequences of war. Erich Remarque&#;s All Quiet on the Western Front is a novel set in the First World War that is against war. The Wars, by Timothy Findley, has numerous symbols and images. However, the symbolism of the four natural elements is very pervasive and effective. Findley uses the symbols of Earth, Water, Air, and Fire in two ways: benevolent and harmful. Findley explicitly conveys the message that a war perverts. Many historians, philosophers and social scientists have come up with various arguments in favor or against the two conclusions about war. To be really specific about war patterns, this essay uses the Dutch Revolt and the Seven Year War to discuss this pattern of war.

The irony in one's 'once being aware of the human condition' most sophisticated sense implicit is that he will probably also see how 'noise in the system due to those who don't understand it' impinges and intrudes upon 'the well-being and quality of life of those that do'.

A further peculiarity of the 'neonate ignorance and pecking order' underlying the human condition then, is that knowledge of those two properties and their implications eventually drives the life-form to 'optimizing the nature and course of the life-form and its geological time-frame' -'the minimization of pejorative consequences of the present upon the well-being and viability of the continuing life-form'.

Worse still then, those that do understand must, eventually, inevitably and 'justifiably', find themselves 'pecking upon those that do not understand' -more ' evolutionary aristocratization ' therein. We are evolved out of ignorance and continue to be born in ignorance, and that means that even as we discover and amass knowledge -the 'if this, then that-ness' of matter and existence, 'new situations' and 'new ignorances' will always present something of a problem to someone as long as we exist.

The human element of war essay

The material of a 'human condition', on the other hand, has to have come into existence the moment any first man communicated 'bother by something he couldn't get a handle on', were that a caveman communicating frustration at trying to flake a blade into existence or the absence of 'life' in a man fallen suddenly dead before him -nor does it end with that ignorance, for lying at the bottom and convoluting the whole is the inseparable combination of sex and pecking order -all of us, therefore, subject to consequences of our own and each other's 'ignorance'.

The phrase itself is a fundamentally philosophical concept, perhaps first 'formally' discussed by some budding Immanuel Kant or such. It is, in this sense, not in general use except perhaps as a write-off of some one or other particular 'irresolvable or wonderment' - eg "That's the human condition"!

In that it is an essentially philosophical phrase, it's the specifics of situations that people commonly relate to and and are important to them, not that 'generality'. Thus, for example, 'the human condition' of an isolated Amazonian aborigine turns upon the primitively simple elements of such life, but that of an environmentalist or 'human rights specialist' may entail the entirety of complex consequences attaching 'logging of the aborigine's forests for civilized, free-enterprise-capitalism furniture' -the deaths of orangatangs and 'western improvement of aboriginal life' among them.

The further situation then is that not only is there something of 'a human condition' endemic the individuals of peoples and nations, but one compounded by typically profound differences between their ' autonomous ' governments and economics due to natural resources, geography, climate et cetera-'diasporatively cheap natural resources and labor' a still-continuing problem.

In the long run, and inherentlymankind will learn to 'do what is necessary to optimize his life-form existence by successively minimizing the energy-wasting and noisome chaff of the human condition'. The more we understand 'the nature of ourselves in our configuration space', the less opinionated we become and the less likely we are to be 'contributing elements to a human condition'.

The problem is that we are literally 'born in ignorance' and raised in a world of people likewise born and raised -which means then, that there is a very nearly overwhelming amount of misinformation, opinion, predisposition et cetera regarding what we 'know' about ourselves and how we 'should' deal with each other -or there wouldn't be the mass of troubles there is in the world today.

However circumstantially, that includes scientists as principals too, because, in general, virtually all institutionalization today has origins NOT in 'a life-form-and-configuration-space laboratory of working scientists', but in 'the neonate ignorance and pecking order of our primitive ancestors'.

The scientist today, in other words, is a scientist only in his laboratory -the mathematician, at his blackboardand otherwise 'only human' outside the lab where 'pecking-order-based lifestyle and quality of life ' money - example drives him and everyone else.

The scientist however -like it or not, is ' stuck ' with being the only person in position to understand the consequences and implications of his genetic imperative and deliberative capabilitythe only one in position of eventually and inevitably being driven and having to learn that 'the life-form has no choice but to optimize the nature and course of its evolution and progression by the heuristic manipulation of government'.


Given the fact of 'neonate ignorance', there cannot but always be something of 'a human condition'. But given, further, the aristocratization intrinsic of 'deliberative capability' and the fact of an inevitably enclosing and limiting geological time-framemankind is both ' stuck ' and driven to 'optimize the nature and course of his viability as a life-form on the planet'.

Or to put it still another way- The more we defer a 'the upset of human-absent natural order by pecking-order-based human existence' to b 'inevitably optimizing the nature and course of the human organism', the more we shorten the physically evolutionary distance between c 'looking back and seeing what pejorative done to our existence at that time' and d 'immediacy of appreciation and correction now' and further the more immediately e 'we improve our life-form well-being and quality of life and geological time-frame'.The Wars, by Timothy Findley, has numerous symbols and images.

However, the symbolism of the four natural elements is very pervasive and effective. Findley uses the symbols of Earth, Water, Air, and Fire in two ways: benevolent and harmful. Findley explicitly conveys the message that a war perverts. After a governmental dispute, a change in ideas, or simple hatred towards nations, a war is engaged.

It starts off by sending innocent lives out to war, most of them not knowing that they are going to sacrifice themselves for the cause of their government.

The last century has been called the Century of Total War: World Wars I and II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and other conflicts took an estimated million human lives.

Is War part of an effort toward its eventual eradication or is it an inevitable element of human existence? If there could be a war that would end all wars forever, the world would be peaceful. However, that is impossible to do.

War is the bane of human existence%(2). The human condition in this especially negative sense is a measure of our ignorance with respect to what we know about ourselves as 'a life-form in its configuration space' -biology, anthropology, the resource/environment, government/economy and 'the nature and course of human evolution and progression', as the idea of that whole and its parts varies thruout the world.

Essay on Machiavelli's The Prince: Politics, War, and Human Nature Words | 6 Pages Machiavelli's The Prince: Politics, War, and Human Nature "[I]t is necessary for a prince to know well how to use the beast and the man.".

Access denied | used Cloudflare to restrict access